Colorado Parenting Time Restriction Forms and Court Documents

A Colorado parenting time restriction is a court process used to ask a family court to limit, suspend, supervise, or otherwise change a parent’s court-ordered parenting time, under C.R.S. § 14-10-129, when the requested restriction is tied to the child’s safety, welfare, or best interests. In Colorado, the central filing is usually JDF 1406: Motion and Affidavit to Change or Restrict Parenting Time, supported when necessary by financial disclosure documents, proof of service documents, and any exhibits that explain why the requested order is justified.

Family law is a matter of state jurisdiction; form requirements and legal standards for restricting parenting time vary significantly across the country.

• Colorado: Uses Judicial Department Forms within domestic-relations cases, including JDF 1406, JDF 1104, JDF 70, and JDF 98.
• California: Generally uses FL-300: Request for Order to request or change custody and visitation orders. California’s self-help materials explain that FL-300 can be used to request custody and visitation orders or change existing orders.
• Texas: Uses a suit to modify the parent-child relationship, usually filed in the court that issued the existing order. TexasLawHelp describes modification as the pathway for changing existing custody, visitation, and support orders.
• New York: Uses Family Court custody and visitation petitions and related forms when a party asks the Family Court to modify or enforce custody or visitation arrangements.

Colorado uses “parenting time,” California uses “visitation,” and Texas uses “possession and access.” The statutes, forms, agencies, and procedural requirements differ correspondingly.

Choosing the correct pathway, forms, and filing court is the first critical step in any Colorado parenting time restriction proceeding. Filing the wrong document, in the wrong court, or without the required supporting materials can delay emergency relief, trigger procedural dismissal, or expose the moving party to sanctions.

Filing requirements often depend on the court, case type, and jurisdiction, so using current documents is a necessity. The RunSensible Forms Library offers court-ready templates and updated legal forms, and with Find the Right Law Forms Online, you can locate the correct forms before paying fees or submitting filings.

What a Colorado Parenting Time Restriction Can Require or Accomplish

A Colorado parenting time restriction allows the court to limit or change a parent’s time with a child when the current arrangement creates a safety concern. Under C.R.S. § 14-10-129, the court may modify parenting time or restrict it when the child faces imminent physical or emotional danger.

Colorado law treats a basic reduction in parenting time differently from a true restriction. A reduction in overnights is usually a modification. A restriction usually means parenting time is suspended, supervised, or limited by conditions that control how, where, or when contact happens.

Common restrictions include:

• Supervised parenting time
• No overnight visits
• Exchanges at a neutral or supervised location
• Limits on travel with the child
• No contact with certain people during parenting time
• Substance abuse testing or treatment
• Domestic violence education or counseling
• Mental health evaluation or treatment

In serious cases, the court may temporarily suspend parenting time until a hearing is held. Emergency restrictions may be requested without advance notice when the facts show immediate danger, but the court must hold a prompt follow-up hearing so both parents can present evidence.

California, Texas, and New York use similar safety-based tools, but with different forms and legal standards. California may use emergency custody or visitation orders. Texas may use temporary orders or modification proceedings involving possession and access. New York Family Court may use custody or visitation petitions, temporary orders, and supervised visitation terms.

The requested restriction should match the evidence. A motion that asks for severe limits without clear facts, supporting documents, proper service, and a specific safety concern may be delayed, narrowed, or denied.

Court Process and Key Steps in Colorado Parenting Time Restriction Process

A parenting time restriction case moves through several procedural stages before the court enters a final order. The process begins with confirming jurisdiction and choosing the correct filing pathway, then moves through form preparation, service, court review, hearing, and enforcement of the resulting order. Each step matters because filing errors, incomplete disclosures, defective service, or missed hearings can delay relief or prevent the court from granting the requested restriction.

Step 1: Confirm jurisdiction and the correct filing pathway

Before filing, the moving party must confirm that the Colorado court has authority to act. In parenting time cases involving more than one state, jurisdiction is usually governed by the UCCJEA. Colorado is generally the child’s home state if the child has lived there for at least six consecutive months before filing.

If the child recently moved, or if another state issued the existing custody or parenting time order, the party may need to register the out-of-state order or resolve jurisdiction before requesting a Colorado restriction. Filing in the wrong court can delay the case or prevent the court from granting relief.

Step 2: Decide whether the case is an emergency restriction or a standard modification

Colorado law treats emergency restrictions differently from ordinary parenting time modifications. If the child faces imminent physical or emotional danger, C.R.S. § 14-10-129(4) allows a parent to seek emergency relief. If the concern is serious but not immediate, the standard modification process is usually the proper pathway.

This distinction matters because an emergency request can be reviewed quickly and may result in temporary restrictions before a full hearing. A standard modification usually requires regular notice, service, and a scheduled hearing. Filing an emergency motion without specific facts can lead to denial and may weaken the moving party’s credibility.

Step 3: Prepare and file JDF 1406

The main Colorado form is JDF 1406, Motion and Affidavit to Change or Restrict Parenting Time. The motion should identify the current parenting time order, explain the requested restriction, and provide specific facts showing why the restriction is necessary.

The affidavit should avoid vague claims and should focus on concrete events, dates, risks, and supporting evidence. Courts are more likely to act when the motion describes specific conduct, such as unsafe supervision, substance abuse during parenting time, domestic violence, threats of abduction, or serious emotional harm to the child.

In California, a comparable request may be made through FL-300, Request for Order, often with emergency custody forms when immediate relief is requested. In Texas, similar relief may be requested through a modification proceeding or temporary orders involving possession and access. In New York, custody or visitation petitions may be used to request temporary or modified visitation terms.

Step 4: Address financial disclosure requirements when support is involved

If the parenting time request is connected to child support, expenses, attorney fees, or other financial issues, Colorado financial disclosure forms may also be required. JDF 1111SC, Sworn Financial Statement, provides income, expense, asset, and debt information. JDF 1104, Certificate of Compliance with Mandatory Financial Disclosures, confirms that required financial disclosures have been exchanged.

These forms are not a substitute for the parenting time motion, but they may be necessary when the requested restriction affects support or financial responsibility. Missing or incomplete disclosures can delay the financial part of the case or lead to compliance orders.

Step 5: Serve the other party and file proof of service

After filing, the other parent must receive proper notice unless the court is considering emergency relief before notice. In Colorado, service may require a sheriff, private process server, or another qualified adult who is not a party to the case.

Proof of service must be filed with the court. JDF 70, Certificate of Service, may be used to show service of documents in an existing case. JDF 98, Affidavit of Service, is used when personal service is completed. If service is defective or proof of service is missing, the hearing may be delayed or the court may refuse to proceed.

Step 6: Court review and temporary orders

Once the motion is filed, the court reviews the documents to decide whether the request is legally and factually sufficient. In an emergency Colorado restriction case, the court may enter temporary limits and schedule a prompt hearing. Temporary restrictions may include supervised parenting time, limited contact, exchange restrictions, travel limits, or temporary suspension of parenting time.

The court may deny immediate relief if the motion lacks specific facts or does not show imminent danger. In California and Texas, courts also review emergency requests quickly, but the forms, notice rules, and temporary order procedures differ. New York courts may issue temporary custody or visitation orders while the case is pending.

Step 7: Attend the evidentiary hearing

The hearing is where both parties present testimony, documents, witnesses, and arguments. In Colorado emergency restriction cases, the court must hold a prompt hearing so the responding parent has an opportunity to be heard.

The moving party must be prepared to prove the safety concern with organized evidence, not just allegations. The court may also order a Child and Family Investigator, a Parental Responsibilities Evaluator, counseling, supervised visitation, or other case management steps if more information is needed.

Missing the hearing can result in denial of the motion, dismissal of the request, or orders entered without the absent party’s evidence.

Step 8: Receive and follow the final order

After review, the court may grant the restriction, deny it, narrow it, or enter different parenting time terms. If granted, the order should state exactly what is allowed, what is prohibited, who supervises contact, how exchanges occur, and what conditions must be completed.

A restriction order is enforceable once entered. Both parents must follow it unless the court later modifies it. The moving party should keep copies of the order, proof of service, hearing notices, and supporting records in case enforcement or later modification becomes necessary.

A missed step in the filing process can delay court review or prevent a restriction request from being heard. Use the RunSensible Forms Library to access court-ready, jurisdiction-specific templates, and visit Find the Right Law Forms Online to locate updated forms for filing, service, financial disclosure, and court compliance.

Filing Fees and Court Costs

Filing a Colorado parenting time restriction request can involve court fees, service costs, e-filing charges, and possible registration costs. Exact amounts vary by court, filing type, and whether the request is filed in an existing domestic relations case, so parties should confirm current fees with the Colorado district court before filing.

Key cost categories include:

• Primary filing fee: JDF 1406, Motion and Affidavit to Change or Restrict Parenting Time, may require a filing fee, especially when filed after the original decree or parenting order has already been entered.
• Response or counter motion fee: If the other parent files a response or counter motion, a separate fee may apply.
• E-filing or processing fees: Electronic filing may involve platform or processing charges.
• Financial disclosure forms: JDF 1111SC and JDF 1104 usually do not create separate filing fees. They are generally filed or exchanged as supporting financial disclosure documents within the same domestic relations case.
• Service costs: Personal service may require payment to a sheriff, private process server, or other authorized person. JDF 98 proves personal service, while JDF 70 may be used for other approved service methods in an existing case.
• Registration costs for out-of-state orders: If another state issued the existing custody or parenting time order, Colorado may require registration under the UCCJEA before enforcement or modification. Registration may involve a separate filing or administrative fee.

Fee waivers may be available for parties who cannot afford court costs. In Colorado, this is commonly requested with JDF 205 and JDF 206. California uses FW-001 and FW-003, while Texas uses a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs.

If the filing fee is not paid and no fee waiver is approved, the clerk may reject the filing. A rejected motion does not reach the judge, does not create a hearing date, and does not provide court protection. In emergency cases, the fee waiver request should be submitted with the motion to avoid unnecessary delay.

Colorado Parenting Time Restriction Forms for Filing, Service, and Disclosure

Colorado parenting time restriction cases are document-driven. Each form has a specific role: one starts the request, others support financial issues when needed, and service forms prove that the other parent received proper notice. Together, these Colorado family court documents create the record the court uses to review the request, schedule hearings, and issue enforceable orders.

JDF 1406: Motion and Affidavit to Change or Restrict Parenting Time

Access JDF 1406: JDF 1406 – Motion and Affidavit to Change or Restrict Parenting Time

JDF 1406 is the main form used to request a parenting time restriction in Colorado. It asks the court to change, limit, supervise, or suspend parenting time based on facts showing that the current arrangement creates a risk to the child.

The form has two key parts. The motion tells the court what order is being requested. The affidavit gives the sworn facts supporting that request. The moving party should identify the existing parenting time order, state the specific restriction requested, and explain why the restriction is necessary.

The affidavit should use concrete facts, such as dates, incidents, witnesses, unsafe behavior, missed exchanges, domestic violence concerns, substance abuse, threats of abduction, or other child-specific risks. General claims that the other parent is unsafe are usually not enough. The facts should connect the parents’ conduct to the child’s safety, emotional well-being, or stability.

JDF 1406 is filed in the Colorado district court handling the existing domestic relations case. If emergency relief is requested under C.R.S. § 14-10-129(4), the filing should clearly explain the imminent physical or emotional danger. If the form is incomplete, unsigned, missing the case number, or unclear about the requested relief, the clerk may reject it, or the court may delay or deny review.

JDF 1111SC: Sworn Financial Statement

Access JDF 1111SC: JDF 1111SC – Sworn Financial Statement

JDF 1111SC is used when the parenting time restriction request is connected to child support, expenses, attorney fees, or other financial issues. It gives the court a sworn overview of a party’s income, expenses, assets, debts, and financial responsibilities.

This form becomes important when the requested restriction affects financial obligations or when the court needs updated financial information to decide related issues. Both parties may be required to complete and exchange financial disclosures.

The form must be accurate, complete, and signed under penalty of perjury. A party should be prepared to support the numbers with pay stubs, tax returns, bank records, debt statements, and other financial documents. Incomplete or inaccurate disclosures can delay child support rulings, damage credibility, or lead to sanctions.

JDF 1104: Certificate of Compliance with Mandatory Financial Disclosures

Access JDF 1104: JDF 1104 – Certificate of Compliance with Mandatory Financial Disclosures

JDF 1104 confirms that required financial disclosures have been exchanged. It does not contain the financial records themselves. Instead, it tells the court that the party has complied with mandatory disclosure requirements.

This form is commonly overlooked because parties may assume that completing JDF 1111SC is enough. In financial matters, JDF 1104 is the procedural confirmation that the required exchange has taken place. The underlying financial documents are usually exchanged between the parties, while the certificate is filed with the court.

If JDF 1104 is missing, the court may delay hearings or decline to decide support-related issues until compliance is shown. If a party files the certificate without actually exchanging the required documents, the court may order additional disclosure or impose other consequences.

JDF 70: Certificate of Service

Access JDF 70: JDF 70 – Certificate of Service

JDF 70 is used to show that court documents were served on the other party or their attorney. It is commonly used after documents are filed in an existing case and must be delivered by an approved method.

The certificate should identify the document served, the date of service, the person served, and the method used. Service may involve electronic filing, mail, email, hand delivery, or another method allowed by the court rules or case procedures.

JDF 70 matters because the court needs proof that the other party received notice. Without proof of service, the court may postpone the hearing or refuse to act on the motion. If the wrong method of service is used, the filing party may need to serve the documents again.

JDF 98: Affidavit of Service

Access JDF 98: JDF 98: Affidavit of Service

JDF 98 is used to prove personal service. It is usually completed by a sheriff, private process server, or qualified adult who is not a party to the case. The person who served the documents signs the affidavit under oath.

This form should state when, where, how, and on whom the documents were served. It is especially important when the court requires formal personal service of JDF 1406 or related documents. Personal service creates a stronger record because it confirms direct delivery to the responding party or another legally acceptable recipient.

If JDF 98 is incomplete, inaccurate, or signed by someone who was not allowed to serve the documents, service may be challenged. Defective service can delay the hearing, prevent the court from entering orders, or make an order vulnerable to later challenge.

Comparable Forms in California, Texas, and New York

Other jurisdictions use different forms to perform similar functions:

• California: Uses FL-300, Request for Order, to request or change custody and visitation orders. Additional emergency forms may be required when immediate custody or visitation relief is requested.
• Texas: Uses modification pleadings, temporary order requests, financial information forms, and returns of service in cases involving possession, access, or support.
• New York: Uses Family Court custody and visitation petitions, temporary order requests, financial disclosure forms when support is involved, and proof of service documents.

These forms are not interchangeable with Colorado JDF forms. Their relevance is procedural rather than practical for a Colorado filing. They show that each jurisdiction uses the same basic document categories: a primary request for relief, supporting financial disclosures when money issues are involved, and proof that the other party received proper notice.

How These Documents Work Together

These forms operate as a single procedural system. JDF 1406 establishes the requested parenting time restriction and the facts supporting it. JDF 1111SC and JDF 1104 address financial transparency when child support, expenses, or other financial responsibilities are involved.

JDF 70 and JDF 98 protect the validity of the process by proving that the other party received notice. Without proper service, the court may not be able to proceed. Without complete financial disclosures, support-related issues may be delayed. Without a clear JDF 1406, the court may not have enough facts to justify a restriction.

The strongest filing packet is complete, specific, and consistent. It identifies the requested restriction, supports the request with sworn facts, includes financial disclosure documents when required, and proves proper service before the hearing.

Parenting time restriction cases depend on complete, accurate, and properly supported court documents. Use the RunSensible Forms Library to access jurisdiction-specific templates, and Find the Right Law Forms Online to identify current forms for filing, disclosure, and service requirements.

Aftermath: Enforcement, Compliance, and Ongoing Obligations

Once a Colorado court issues a parenting time restriction order, it has immediate legal authority. Both parents must follow the order exactly until it is modified, terminated, or replaced. The restricted parent cannot exercise parenting time outside the order’s limits, and the other parent cannot create new restrictions or exceptions without court approval.

If the court issues a signed restriction order, such as an Order Re: Restriction of Parenting Time, violations may be enforced through contempt. A violation may include unsupervised contact when supervision is required, taking the child outside an approved location, violating travel limits, ignoring exchange rules, or contacting the child when contact has been suspended. If the violation is willful, the court may order fines, attorney fees, make-up parenting time, added restrictions, or other contempt remedies.

Real-time enforcement can be challenging. Law enforcement may hesitate to intervene in family court disputes unless the order is specific and directly enforceable. Parties should keep certified copies of the signed order available and make sure the order clearly states what is allowed, what is prohibited, and whether law enforcement assistance is authorized.

If the restriction includes treatment, testing, or supervised contact, the restricted parent must be ready to prove compliance. Important records may include:

• Drug or alcohol test results
• Treatment or counseling records
• Supervisor reports
• Attendance confirmations
• Completion certificates
• Therapeutic visitation or parent coaching records

A parenting time restriction is not always permanent. Either parent may ask the court to modify the order under C.R.S. § 14-10-129 if circumstances have changed. A restricted parent seeking more parenting time should show meaningful compliance and evidence that the original safety risk has been reduced or resolved. A parent seeking continued restriction should document ongoing concerns, missed conditions, failed tests, unsafe conduct, or violations.

Appeal may be available from a final Colorado district court order, but deadlines are strict. Emergency orders, later replaced by a final order after hearing, may not always be separately appealable, so timing and procedural posture matter.

Both parents should maintain organized records, including exchange logs, supervisor notes, parenting time messages, proof of missed or completed visits, police reports if applicable, treatment records, testing results, filed documents, and court orders. These records may become important in later enforcement, modification, compliance, or appeal proceedings.

Common Mistakes and Best Practices

Procedural precision matters in a Colorado parenting time restriction case because the court must balance child safety, parental rights, notice, and reliable evidence. A strong filing is specific, properly documented, properly served, and tied to the legal standard for restricting parenting time.

Common Mistakes

• Filing in the wrong court: The motion usually belongs in the Colorado district court case that entered the existing parenting time or parental responsibilities order. If another state issued the order, UCCJEA jurisdiction may need to be addressed first.
• Using the wrong or outdated forms: JDF 1406 is the main form for a Colorado parenting time restriction. JDF 1111SC and JDF 1104 may also be needed if child support, expenses, or financial issues are involved.
• Writing a vague affidavit: General claims like “the other parent is unsafe” are not enough. JDF 1406 should include dates, incidents, witnesses, child-specific harm, and facts showing why the restriction is necessary.
• Submitting disorganized evidence: Police reports, messages, school records, medical records, photos, and witness statements should be organized and connected to the claims in the affidavit.
• Serving documents incorrectly: Informal notice, such as texting the other parent, does not replace proper service. JDF 70 or JDF 98 should be filed to prove notice.
• Omitting financial disclosures when required: If support or financial responsibility is affected, an incomplete JDF 1111SC or a missing JDF 1104 can delay rulings or lead to sanctions.
• Overusing emergency relief: Emergency requests should be reserved for facts showing imminent physical or emotional danger. Weak emergency filings may be denied or treated as standard modification requests.
• Arriving unprepared for the hearing: The moving party should be ready with testimony, exhibits, proof of service, prior orders, and a clear proposed restriction.

Best Practices

• Build a clear timeline: Organize events by date and show what happened, who witnessed it, what evidence supports it, and how it affected the child.
• Keep the affidavit factual: Focus on child safety, parenting time, and concrete facts. Avoid unrelated conflict, personal attacks, and unsupported assumptions.
• Prepare strong supporting records: Useful evidence may include police reports, school communications, medical or counseling records, parenting app messages, photos, videos, witness declarations, prior orders, drug or alcohol testing records, and supervisor notes.
• Plan service early: Use a sheriff, process server, or qualified non-party adult when personal service is required. File JDF 98 or JDF 70 immediately after service is completed.
• Complete financial forms carefully: If financial issues are involved, JDF 1111SC should match supporting records such as pay stubs, tax returns, bank statements, debt records, and expense documents. JDF 1104 should be filed only after disclosures are exchanged.
• Prepare a specific proposed order: Identify whether the request is for supervised visits, no overnights, neutral exchanges, travel limits, treatment requirements, or temporary suspension.
• Match the requested restriction to the evidence: Courts may prefer targeted safety measures before suspending parenting time entirely. The requested relief should fit the documented risk.
• Keep records after the order: Save court orders, service documents, parenting time logs, supervisor notes, messages, compliance records, and proof of missed or completed visits for possible enforcement or modification.

Many filing problems can be avoided by using current forms, complete templates, and tools designed for jurisdiction-specific compliance. The RunSensible Forms Library supports efficient drafting and filing, and Find the Right Law Forms Online helps users locate updated legal documents before submitting them to court.

Final Thoughts

Colorado courts treat parenting time restrictions as serious requests because they can immediately change how a parent may have contact with a child. The filing must therefore begin with the right legal pathway: a standard modification, an emergency restriction under C.R.S. § 14-10-129(4), or a UCCJEA jurisdictional step when another state may have authority over the order.

The strength of the request depends on the documents that support it. JDF 1406 must present sworn, specific facts that justify the requested restriction. JDF 1111SC and JDF 1104 become important when parenting time overlaps with support, expenses, or financial responsibility. JDF 70 or JDF 98 completes the procedural record by proving that the other party received proper notice. Together, these forms show the court what is being requested, why it is justified, and whether the filing is ready for review.

The same discipline must continue after filing and after any order is entered. Missed deadlines, vague allegations, incomplete disclosures, defective service, or poor record keeping can weaken even a serious safety concern. A party who uses current forms, documents the facts carefully, follows service rules, appears at hearings, and preserves compliance records is better positioned for enforcement, modification, or appeal. This information is general procedural guidance, not legal advice, and anyone facing a parenting time restriction issue should consult a licensed Colorado family law attorney for advice based on their specific facts.

FAQs

1.    What does parenting time restriction mean in Colorado?

A parenting time restriction is a court order that limits, conditions, supervises, or temporarily suspends a parent’s time with a child. In Colorado, the court may restrict parenting time when unrestricted contact would endanger the child’s physical health or significantly impair the child’s emotional development. Restrictions can range from supervised visits to temporary suspension of contact.

2.    When should a parent file for an emergency restriction instead of a standard modification?

Emergency relief is appropriate when the child faces an immediate risk, such as active domestic violence, substance abuse during parenting time, credible abduction concerns, or other urgent safety threats. If the concern is serious but does not require immediate court action, a standard modification may be the better pathway. Courts review emergency requests closely, so the filing must explain the danger with specific facts.

3.    Which Colorado forms are needed to restrict parenting time?

The main form is JDF 1406, Motion and Affidavit to Change or Restrict Parenting Time. If support, expenses, attorney fees, or other financial issues are involved, the parties may also need JDF 1111SC and JDF 1104. After service, proof of notice is usually filed through JDF 70 or JDF 98, depending on the service method.

4.    What facts should be included in JDF 1406?

JDF 1406 should include specific events, dates, witnesses, documents, and child-related harm or risk. General statements that the other parent is unsafe, irresponsible, or difficult are usually not enough. The affidavit should clearly connect the facts to the requested restriction, such as supervision, no overnights, travel limits, treatment conditions, or temporary suspension.

5.    Does the other parent have to be notified?

In standard proceedings, the other parent must be properly served before the court can proceed. Emergency requests may be reviewed before notice when immediate danger is alleged, but the other parent must still receive the order and have a prompt opportunity to respond. Proper service and proof of service are essential because they protect due process and the enforceability of any order.

6.    What is the difference between JDF 70 and JDF 98?

JDF 70 is a Certificate of Service used to show that documents were delivered to the other party or attorney through an approved method in an existing case. JDF 98 is an Affidavit of Service used to prove personal service, usually by a sheriff, process server, or qualified non-party adult. The correct form depends on the type of service required and how the documents were delivered.

7.    What happens if a parenting time restriction order is violated?

A violation can lead to enforcement through contempt or other court remedies. Examples include unsupervised contact when supervision is required, violating travel limits, ignoring exchange rules, or contacting the child when contact has been suspended. The court may order fines, attorney fees, make-up parenting time, added restrictions, or other remedies if the violation is proven.

8.    Can a Colorado parenting time restriction be changed later?

Yes. Either parent may ask the court to modify or lift a restriction if circumstances have changed. A restricted parent seeking more time should provide proof of compliance, such as treatment records, test results, supervisor reports, or other evidence showing that the original risk has been reduced. A parent seeking to keep the restriction in place should document ongoing violations, missed conditions, or continued safety concerns.

Resources

1. Denver Parenting Time Restriction Lawyers | Law Office of Stephan E. Uslan – Family Law, https://www.uslanlaw.com/family-law/parenting-time-restrictions/
2. Motion to Restrict Parental Contact – Men’s Rights Law, https://www.mensrightslaw.com/denver-child-custody-lawyer/motion-to-restrict-parental-contact/
3. What Is a Motion to Restrict Parenting Time? – Griffiths Law PC, https://www.griffithslawpc.com/resources/restrict-parenting-time/
4. FL-300-INFO Information Sheet for Request for Order (Family Law) – California Courts – CA.gov, https://courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/courts/default/2024-11/fl300info.pdf
5. FL-305 Temporary Emergency (Ex Parte) Orders – California Courts, https://courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/courts/default/2024-11/fl305.pdf
6. Emergency Child Custody Orders | Dallas Divorce Lawyers McClure Law Group, https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/emergency-child-custody-orders.html
7. How to File for Emergency Custody in Texas, https://texasdivorcelawyer.us/file-for-emergency-custody/
8. Need Emergency Parenting Time Change in Colorado? Act Now – Flatiron Legal Advisors, https://www.flatironlegal.com/emergency-custody-modification-colorado/
9. Because the district court in this case did not eliminate or otherwise – Colorado Judicial Branch, https://www.coloradojudicial.gov/system/files/opinions-2026-05/25SC220.pdf
10. IN RE: the MARRIAGE OF Nicholas Jay DALE (2026) – FindLaw Caselaw, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/co-supreme-court/57701.html
11. In re Marriage of Dale:: 2026:: Colorado Supreme Court Decisions – Justia Law, https://law.justia.com/cases/colorado/supreme-court/2026/25sc220.html